Keywords:-
Article Content:-
Abstract
The persistent disagreement between locally measured and globally inferred values of the Hubble constant, commonly known as the Hubble tension, has become one of the most challenging problems in modern cosmology. While many proposed explanations involve modifications to early-Universe physics or dark energy, the possible role of local spacetime inhomogeneities and continuous matter creation remains relatively unexplored. In this work, we develop a spherically symmetric inhomogeneous cosmological model based on the Lemaître Tolman–Bondi (LTB) spacetime within the framework of the Hoyle–Narlikar C-field theory. The model introduces a curvature-dependent matter creation mechanism, in which the creation rate is governed by the local spatial curvature gradient inside a cosmic under-density. The modified Einstein field equations are solved analytically to obtain the localized Misner–Sharp mass, position-dependent expansion parameters, and other relevant kinematical quantities. Numerical illustrations show that the proposed mechanism naturally enhances the local expansion rate within the under-dense region while gradually approaching the standard homogeneous cosmological behaviour at large distances. As a result, the model provides a physically consistent framework in which local and global measurements of the Hubble parameter can differ without altering the large-scale evolution of the Universe. These findings suggest that curvature-coupled matter creation in an inhomogeneous spacetime offers a promising theoretical perspective for understanding the Hubble tension and encourages further observational and phenomenological investigations.
References:-
References
Lemaître G (1933) The expanding universe. Ann Soc Sci Bruxelles A53:51–85.
Tolman RC (1934) Effect of inhomogeneity on cosmological models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 20(3):169–176.
Bondi H (1947) Spherically symmetrical models in general relativity. Mon Not R Astron Soc 107(5 6):410–425.
Misner CW, Sharp DH (1964) Relativistic equations for adiabatic, spherically symmetric gravitational collapse. Phys Rev 136:B571–B576.
Hoyle F, Narlikar JV (1964) A new theory of gravitation. Proc R Soc Lond A282:191–207.
Hoyle F, Narlikar JV (1966) On the avoidance of singularities in C-field cosmology. Proc R Soc Lond A290:177–185.
Singh CP (2024) Matter creation effects in Lemaître–Tolman–Bondi non-homogeneous universes. Pramana – J Phys 98(2):77–89.
Lusso E, et al. (2026) Quasars as high-redshift distance indicators and constraints on local spatial expansion parameters. Astron Astrophys 702:L3.
Amirhashchi H (2024) Resolving cosmological tensions using alternative theories of gravitation. Int J Theor Phys 63(4):98.
Bhattacharya S (2023) Inhomogeneous cosmological metrics and local expansion profiles. J Cosmol Astropart Phys 2023(10):034.
Wang D, Meng XH (2026) Constraining continuous creation field parameters with the latest 2026 distance indicators. Mod Phys Lett A 41(3):2650045.
Sadeghi J, et al. (2025) Local under-densities and their impact on cosmic expansion parameters. Phys Dark Universe 49:108.
Naidu RP (2025) Mapping large-scale voids and cosmic filaments using precision spectroscopic surveys. Astrophys J 981(1):44–56.
Prasad R (2024) Analytical solutions of Einstein's equations for spherically symmetric inhomogeneous matter systems. J Math Phys 65(3):032502.
Zhai Z, et al. (2025) Cosmological implications of baryonic acoustic oscillation metrics from early DESI data releases. Phys Rev D 111(1):013502.
Peebles PJE (2025) The evolving history of cosmic tensions and alternative cosmological models. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys 63:15–38.
