Keywords:-

Keywords: intervention, preservice mathematics teacher education, problem-posing, standards-based curriculum, teacher efficacy

Article Content:-

Abstract

This study explored the effects of a structured problem-posing intervention on preservice mathematics teachers' (PSTs) problem-posing efficacy. Using a mixed-methods approach, 25 PSTs participated in multiple intervention sessions, with data collected through pre- and post-surveys and semi-structured interviews. Results showed a significant improvement in efficacy, with mean scores rising from 2.27 to 4.07 and an effect size of Hedges’ g = 1.85. Qualitative analysis highlighted themes such as increased confidence and independence, collaborative strategies for overcoming challenges, and criteria for effective problem design. The findings suggest that such interventions can enhance PSTs’ pedagogical skills, urging their inclusion in teacher preparation programmes.

References:-

References

Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2020). Learning to teach through mathematical problem posing: Theoretical considerations, methodology, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.01.001.

Singer, F. M., Ellerton, N., & Cai, J. (Eds.). (2015). Mathematical problem posing: From research to effective practice. Springer.

Xie, S., & Masingila, J. O. (2017). Examining interactions between problem posing and problem solving with prospective primary teachers: A case of using fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 101–118.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805.

Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into students’ problem posing in school mathematics. In P. C. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education (pp. 518–525). Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

Chapman, O. (2015). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge for teaching problem solving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(1):19–36. https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.v3i1.1049.

National Council for Curriculum and Assessment [NaCCA]. (2020). Mathematics, Common Core Programme Curriculum (Basic 7 – 10). Ministry of Education, Ghana

National Governors Association Centre for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.

OECD. (2018). PISA 2022 Mathematics Framework (Draft). OECD Publishing.

Cai, J., & Jiang, C. (2017). An analysis of problem-posing tasks in Chinese and US elementary mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(8), 1521–1540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9758-2

Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M., & Zeichner, K. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). Jossey-Bass.

Crespo, S. (2003). Learning to pose mathematical problems: Exploring changes in preservice teachers’ practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 243–270.

Stoyanova, E. (2005). Problem-posing strategies used by years 8 and 9 students. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 61(3), 6–11.

Chapman, O. (2015). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge for teaching problem solving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(1):19–36. https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.v3i1.1049.

Yuan, X., & Sriraman, B. (2011). An exploratory study of relationships between students’ creativity and mathematical problem-posing abilities. In B. Sriraman & K. H. Lee (Eds.), The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics (pp. 5–28). Sense Publishers.

Cai, J. (2025). Integrating problem posing into school mathematics. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 4(2), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263251346990

Leung, S. S. (2013). Teachers implementing mathematical problem posing in the classroom: Challenges and strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9436-4

Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (1983). The art of problem posing. Franklin Institute Press.

Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.

Kilpatrick, J. (1987). Problem formulating: Where do good problems come from? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 123–147). Erlbaum.

English, L. D. (2020). Teaching and learning through mathematical problem posing: Commentary. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.06.014

Crespo, S., & Sinclair, N. (2008). What makes a problem mathematically interesting? Inviting prospective teachers to pose better problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(5), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9081-0

Ticha, M., & Hospesova, A. (2013). Developing teachers’ subject didactic competence through problem posing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 133–143.

Morris, A. K., Hiebert, J., & Spitzer, S. M. (2009). Mathematical knowledge for teaching in planning and evaluating instruction: What can preservice teachers learn? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(5), 491–529. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.40.5.0491

Philipp, R. A., Ambrose, R., Lamb, L. L., Sowder, J. T., Schappelle, B. P., Sowder, L., ... & Chauvot, J. (2007). Effects of early field experiences on the mathematical content knowledge and beliefs of prospective elementary school teachers: An experimental study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 438–476.

Liljedahl, P. (2016). Building thinking classrooms: Conditions for problem solving. In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems (pp. 361–386). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_21

Horn, I. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 37–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400709336942.

Zopf, D. A. (2010). Mathematical knowledge for teaching problem posing: An exploratory case study. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

Leikin, R. (2015). Problem Posing for and Through Investigations in a Dynamic Geometry Environment. In: Singer, F., F. Ellerton, N., Cai, J. (eds) Mathematical Problem Posing. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_18

Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). FT Press.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107–128.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Lirasan, M. R. A., Adamson, M. H. B., Cruz, V. G., Capuchino, J. A. T., De Jesus, L. A. L. D., Peñaloza, R. A. C., Francisco, J. D., Gulmatico, M. A. G., Valiente, J. E. R., Soriano, M. G. R., & Oquendo, R. A. A. (2025). Understanding Underreporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in the Philippines: A Mixed Methods Study. Drugs - Real World Outcomes, 12(3), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-025-00492-z

Andrew, S. & Halcomb, E. J. (2009). Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Akkerman, S. F., & Meijer, P. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualising teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 308–319.

Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: a.k.a. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751.

Presmeg, N. C. (2006). Research on visualisation in learning and teaching mathematics. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 205-235). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901127_009

Sullivan, P., Clarke, D. M., & Clarke, B. (2013). Teaching with tasks for effective mathematics learning. Springer.

Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-005-1223-z

Downloads

Citation Tools

How to Cite
Agbozo, K., & Bonyah, E. (2026). Developing Problem-Posing Efficacy in Preservice Mathematics Teachers: A Competency Intervention Study. International Journal Of Mathematics And Computer Research, 14(04), 6282-6294. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmcr/v14i4.04