Keywords:-
Article Content:-
Abstract
Customer satisfaction is defined as a measurement that determines the level of customer satisfaction with the products, services and capabilities of a service provider. In this article, we determine the priority order of criteria that influence the customer satisfaction in the mathematics and science learning center using the AHP method.
Based on the results of the AHP method, the main priority criterion is responsibility of providing information related to services with weight criterion is 0.216.
References:-
References
Setiono, B. A, and Hidayat S. 2022. “Influence of service quality with the dimensions of reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy and tangibles on customer satisfaction". International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research 6, No. 09: 330-341.
Gupta, S., Modgil, S., Bhattacharyya, S. 2022. Artificial intelligence for decision support systems in the field of operations research: review and future scope of research. Ann Oper Res 308 :215–274.
Sambasivan, M., Fei, N. Y. 2008. Evaluation of critical success factors of implementation of ISO 14001 using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): a case study from Malaysia. Journal of cleaner production, 16(13) :1424-1433.
Yusuff, R. M., Yee, K. P., and Hashmi, M. S. J. 2001. A preliminary study on the potential use of the analytical hierarchical process (AHP) to predict advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) implementation. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 17(5) : 421-427.
Pan, F. C. (2006). Escalate BSC power by AHP: innovative approach for strategy implementation. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 7(2-3), 337-351.
Mathiyazhagan, K., Diabat, A., Al-Refaie, A., Xu, L. .2015. Application of analytical hierarchy process to evaluate pressures to implement green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107 : 229-236.
Noorani, N. M., Zamani, A. T., Alenezi, M., Shameem, M., Singh, P. 2022. Factor prioritization for effectively implementing DevOps in software development organizations: a SWOT-AHP approach. Axioms, 11(10) : 498.
Hanin, N., Zaria, D., Dhandio, D. J., & Kusnandar, D. 2023. Implementation of AHP-TOPSIS as a support for making decisions on micro business funding in sambas regency. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 7(1).
Abdullah, A., Saraswat, S., and Talib, F. 2023. Barriers and strategies for sustainable manufacturing implementation in SMEs: A hybrid fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework. Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics, 2, 100012. Y.T. Yu, M.F. Lau, "A comparison of MC/DC, MUMCUT and several other coverage criteria for logical decisions", Journal of Systems and Software, 2005, in press.
Sharifian, Z., Barekatain, B., Ariza Quintana, A., Beheshti, Z., & Safi-Esfahani, F. 2022. LOADng-AT: a novel practical implementation of hybrid AHP-TOPSIS algorithm in reactive routing protocol for intelligent IoT-based networks. The Journal of Supercomputing, 78(7) : 9521-9569.